Skip to content

Conversation

@ax3l
Copy link
Member

@ax3l ax3l commented Oct 22, 2025

Update to include all currently defined elements and parameter classes.

@ax3l ax3l self-assigned this Oct 22, 2025
@ax3l ax3l added the element kinds beamline elements & segments/lines label Oct 22, 2025
This was referenced Oct 22, 2025
@ax3l ax3l force-pushed the update-elements branch 3 times, most recently from a9c3c05 to 3738740 Compare October 23, 2025 18:06
Based on the prompt
> We defined a meta-data schema for particle accelerator lattice lements in pals.
> You will find in pals/source the description of elements and their meta-data, the pals/examples has an example.
> Ignore the inheritance feature for now.
> I want you to find and read the element definitions.
> I want you to find and read the implementation of existing PALS Python elements in pals-python/. Follow their structure and style.
> Then, do this workflow:
> 1. read and understand one element at a time
> 2. go to pals-python/schema and add a new element, one at a time, following the existing implementation
> 3. go to pals-python/tests/test_schema.py and define a compact test per new element
> Repeat this until all elements defined in PALS are implemented in pals-python.

And ~20 follow-up prompts.
@ax3l ax3l force-pushed the update-elements branch 3 times, most recently from 09c6479 to c95f8f6 Compare October 23, 2025 19:11
@ax3l ax3l changed the title [WIP] Comprehensive Element Update Comprehensive Element Update Oct 23, 2025
@ax3l ax3l force-pushed the update-elements branch 4 times, most recently from 14555ab to 14d22be Compare October 23, 2025 19:46
Comment on lines +10 to +11
# TODO: add ElectricMultipoleParameters in a follow-up RP
# https://pals-project.readthedocs.io/en/latest/element-parameters.html#electricmultipolep-electric-multipole-parameters
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I want to keep this PR relatively simple and this property is not.
So let's do this in #38

@ax3l ax3l requested a review from EZoni October 23, 2025 19:53
@ax3l ax3l assigned EZoni and unassigned ax3l Oct 23, 2025
Comment on lines +181 to +182
# UnionEle
unionele = pals.UnionEle(name="unionele1", elements=[])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we can leave it here, but what is the purpose of this empty union?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, good point.

We did not talk about this in the PALS standard: do we allow an empty union (e.g., for convenience in lattice manipulations). We can leave it here and allow it for now.

But we should add a test that has actual sub-elements.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#39

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will go in #40

Co-authored-by: Edoardo Zoni <[email protected]>
And more limits on ints and string literal values.
@ax3l ax3l mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Comment on lines +52 to 54
# Base classes (for testing compatibility)
BaseElement,
ThickElement,
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will remove this in a follow-up PR: we do not want to expose mixin classes as real element in a concrete BeamLine. I already update the tests accordingly.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With #40

@ax3l ax3l requested a review from EZoni October 27, 2025 22:49
@ax3l ax3l mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
3 tasks
Comment on lines -31 to -37
passed = True
try:
with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
element.length = element_length
except ValidationError as e:
print(e)
passed = False
assert not passed
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great to learn that this can be done in two lines - didn't know that.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep! :) I use this in pyAMReX quite a bit to ensure we do not segfault but can recover on issues.

Copy link
Member

@EZoni EZoni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reviewed the commits after my last review and they look good to me. We can do more work on the tests in future PRs, if needed.

@EZoni EZoni merged commit bb0afa7 into pals-project:main Oct 28, 2025
6 checks passed
@ax3l ax3l deleted the update-elements branch October 28, 2025 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

element kinds beamline elements & segments/lines

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants